Minghui serves as a source of news about the persecution in mainland China. For true cultivators, however, there is no interest in the majority of the article submissions to Minghui because they are repetitive and of little value, often talking about, for example, irrelevant matters like family matters or what it was like in the early days in mainland China when the practice was first spread– as if that gives the practitioners who were living in China back then any special distinction or puts them in any higher position among practitioners. That’s just showing off and wasting time. Having been around in mainland China in the 1990s has no effect on anything and is just when they came into contact with the practice for the first time. All that matters is whether you practice cultivation according to the requirements, and if you haven’t done that for 20 or 30 years you are less than someone who has practiced true cultivation for just one month. That’s the truth of the matter. If you don’t do what the practice asks for a long time, what difference does it make that you have stuck around for years?

Minghui is a website that average practitioners like to visit as if it is very important for them, and they follow it closely. How can you follow these low quality articles so closely? They are really boring and far away from the books and lectures, like two separate things. There is nothing in them to read after they all say the same thing. The experiences they share are of little value if you put Falun Gong into practice. But I would never be able to convince any of the stubborn average practitioners that this is true. Here’s the proof for them, though: if outsiders can fake the articles, then what I just said must be true, because this is a supernormal practice and if you can’t tell the ordinary from the supernormal– if you can’t tell that the entire website was taken over by hostile outsiders who don’t believe in supernormal phenomena– then what is your cultivation founded on? You don’t have any progress in your cultivation practice to speak of. How can you deny this?

Let’s tell it how it is here: these practitioners try to substitute sincere study of the books with reading these dull and repetitive articles on Minghui and then they pretend like they are an important part of their practice. For someone who knows they are doing this, how can you deal with that?! I want to know something: do you really think that your cultivation practice is solid if you can be deceived by forged articles written by outsiders– for more than a year? What kind of articles do you think matter to your cultivation practice? If I tried to convince you that you have low standards, you’d never listen to me. I think the deep state agents will help.

Here is another aspect to the situation. Because the deep state agents read the books closely and adapt what they take in to make their fake articles, their fake articles sometimes say things that are much better than what the average practitioners would ever put in an article submission. The closer they write to the books and lectures, the better the fake articles are. It is sad that practitioners can’t tell the difference, but… you all need to be taught a lesson and this is it.